| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The code patching code wants to get the value of a struct ppc_inst as
a u64 when the instruction is prefixed, so we can pass the u64 down to
__put_user_asm() and write it with a single store.
The optprobes code wants to load a struct ppc_inst as an immediate
into a register so it is useful to have it as a u64 to use the
existing helper function.
Currently this is a bit awkward because the value differs based on the
CPU endianness, so add a helper to do the conversion.
This fixes the usage in arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe() which was
previously incorrect on big endian.
Fixes: 650b55b707fd ("powerpc: Add prefixed instructions to instruction data type")
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Tested-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200526072630.2487363-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
|
|
In a few places we want to calculate the address of the next
instruction. Previously that was simple, we just added 4 bytes, or if
using a u32 * we incremented that pointer by 1.
But prefixed instructions make it more complicated, we need to advance
by either 4 or 8 bytes depending on the actual instruction. We also
can't do pointer arithmetic using struct ppc_inst, because it is
always 8 bytes in size on 64-bit, even though we might only need to
advance by 4 bytes.
So add a ppc_inst_next() helper which calculates the location of the
next instruction, if the given instruction was located at the given
address. Note the instruction doesn't need to actually be at the
address in memory.
Although it would seem natural for the value to be passed by value,
that makes it too easy to write a loop that will read off the end of a
page, eg:
for (; src < end; src = ppc_inst_next(src, *src),
dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, *dest))
As noticed by Christophe and Jordan, if end is the exact end of a
page, and the next page is not mapped, this will fault, because *dest
will read 8 bytes, 4 bytes into the next page.
So value is passed by reference, so the helper can be careful to use
ppc_inst_read() on it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200522133318.1681406-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
|
|
For powerpc64, redefine the ppc_inst type so both word and prefixed
instructions can be represented. On powerpc32 the type will remain the
same. Update places which had assumed instructions to be 4 bytes long.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
[mpe: Rework the get_user_inst() macros to be parameterised, and don't
assign to the dest if an error occurred. Use CONFIG_PPC64 not
__powerpc64__ in a few places. Address other comments from
Christophe. Fix some sparse complaints.]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-24-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
Currently all instructions have the same length, but in preparation for
prefixed instructions introduce a function for returning instruction
length.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-18-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
Introduce a probe_kernel_read_inst() function to use in cases where
probe_kernel_read() is used for getting an instruction. This will be
more useful for prefixed instructions.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
[mpe: Don't write to *inst on error]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-15-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
Introduce a probe_user_read_inst() function to use in cases where
probe_user_read() is used for getting an instruction. This will be
more useful for prefixed instructions.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
[mpe: Don't write to *inst on error, fold in __user annotations]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-14-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
Prefixed instructions will mean there are instructions of different
length. As a result dereferencing a pointer to an instruction will not
necessarily give the desired result. Introduce a function for reading
instructions from memory into the instruction data type.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-13-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
Currently unsigned ints are used to represent instructions on powerpc.
This has worked well as instructions have always been 4 byte words.
However, ISA v3.1 introduces some changes to instructions that mean
this scheme will no longer work as well. This change is Prefixed
Instructions. A prefixed instruction is made up of a word prefix
followed by a word suffix to make an 8 byte double word instruction.
No matter the endianness of the system the prefix always comes first.
Prefixed instructions are only planned for powerpc64.
Introduce a ppc_inst type to represent both prefixed and word
instructions on powerpc64 while keeping it possible to exclusively
have word instructions on powerpc32.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
[mpe: Fix compile error in emulate_spe()]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-12-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
In preparation for an instruction data type that can not be directly
used with the '==' operator use functions for checking equality.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-11-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
Use a function for byte swapping instructions in preparation of a more
complicated instruction type.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-10-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
In preparation for using a data type for instructions that can not be
directly used with the '>>' operator use a function for getting the op
code of an instruction.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-9-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
In preparation for introducing a more complicated instruction type to
accommodate prefixed instructions use an accessor for getting an
instruction as a u32.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-8-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
|
In preparation for instructions having a more complex data type start
using a macro, ppc_inst(), for making an instruction out of a u32. A
macro is used so that instructions can be used as initializer elements.
Currently this does nothing, but it will allow for creating a data type
that can represent prefixed instructions.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
[mpe: Change include guard to _ASM_POWERPC_INST_H]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-7-jniethe5@gmail.com
|
Michael Ellerman
Jordan Niethe
