Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
lockdep.c now uses ARRAY_SIZE().
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Fixes: 75dd602a5198 ("lockdep: Fix lock_chain::base size")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-4-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
liblockdep has been broken since commit 75dd602a5198 ("lockdep: Fix
lock_chain::base size"), as that adds a check that MAX_LOCK_DEPTH is
within the range of lock_chain::depth and in liblockdep it is much
too large.
That should have resulted in a compiler error, but didn't because:
- the check uses ARRAY_SIZE(), which isn't yet defined in liblockdep
so is assumed to be an (undeclared) function
- putting a function call inside a BUILD_BUG_ON() expression quietly
turns it into some nonsense involving a variable-length array
It did produce a compiler warning, but I didn't notice because
liblockdep already produces too many warnings if -Wall is enabled
(which I'll fix shortly).
Even before that commit, which reduced lock_chain::depth from 8 bits
to 6, MAX_LOCK_DEPTH was too large.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for versions before 4.6, use a value of 255
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525130005.5947-3-alexander.levin@verizon.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
This was added to the kernel code in <1658d35ead5d> ("list: Use
READ_ONCE() when testing for empty lists").
There's nothing special we need to do about it in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <alfredoalvarezfernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455864533-7536-2-git-send-email-alfredoalvarezernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
It seems that newer gcc complains about lack of explicit declaration for some
of the API we use, add it in.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
These were added to the kernel code in cee34d88c ("lockdep: Fix a race between
/proc/lock_stat and module unload"). There's nothing special we need to do
about them in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
Recent changes to rbtree.h may break compilation. There is no
reason to use a liblockdep specific header to begin with, so
we'll use the one shared with all other tools/.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440479985-6696-3-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
As Peter Zijlstra pointed out, the varargs for WARN() are
optional, so we need to correctly handle the case where they
don't exist.
This would cause a compilation error.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1440479985-6696-2-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Recent changes to kernel/locking/lockdep.c broke the liblockdep build. Fix
that.
Signed-off-by: Eunbong Song <eunb.song@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
Combine all definitions into a common tools/include/linux/types.h and
kill the wild growth elsewhere. Move DECLARE_BITMAP to its proper
bitmap.h header.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-azczs7qcv6h9xek9od10hiv2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
|
|
So tools/ has been growing three, at a different stage of their
development export.h headers and so we should unite into one. Add
tools/include/ to the include path of virtio and liblockdep to pick the
shared header now.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397493185-19521-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
|
|
Commit 63f9a7fde7 "asmlinkage: Make lockdep_sys_exit asmlinkage" has added
asmlinkage annotation to lockdep_sys_exit, which broke build of liblockdep.
Since we don't need asmlinkage in liblockep, just ignore it.
Reported-by: Eunbong Song <eunb.song@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Robin Hack <rhack@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
Stub out rcu_is_watching(), prevents build error with the updated
tree.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
kernel/locking/lockdep.c deals with validating locking scenarios for
various architectures supported by the kernel. There isn't
anything kernel specific going on in lockdep, and when we
compare userspace to other architectures that don't have to deal
with irqs such as s390, they become all too similar.
We wrap kernel/locking/lockdep.c and include/linux/lockdep.h with
several headers which allow us to build and use lockdep from
userspace. We don't touch the kernel code itself which means
that any work done on lockdep in the kernel will automatically
benefit userspace lockdep as well!
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1371163284-6346-3-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|