From 787dbea11a5d6843999ff71a3fb9aa1ed6d5d889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Dooks Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:55:09 +0100 Subject: profile: setup_profiling_timer() is moslty not implemented The setup_profiling_timer() is mostly un-implemented by many architectures. In many places it isn't guarded by CONFIG_PROFILE which is needed for it to be used. Make it a weak symbol in kernel/profile.c and remove the 'return -EINVAL' implementations from the kenrel. There are a couple of architectures which do return 0 from the setup_profiling_timer() function but they don't seem to do anything else with it. To keep the /proc compatibility for now, leave these for a future update or removal. On ARM, this fixes the following sparse warning: arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:793:5: warning: symbol 'setup_profiling_timer' was not declared. Should it be static? Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220721195509.418205-1-ben-linux@fluff.org Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/parisc/kernel') diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c index 24d0744c3b3a..7dbd92cafae3 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c @@ -513,10 +513,3 @@ void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) pdc_cpu_rendezvous_unlock(); } - -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS -int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) -{ - return -EINVAL; -} -#endif -- cgit v1.2.3