From 9d349d47f0e39b4d1b68793ded2459daa1f948f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 23:07:17 +0200 Subject: x86/smpboot: Make TSC synchronization function call based Spin-waiting on the control CPU until the AP reaches the TSC synchronization is just a waste especially in the case that there is no synchronization required. As the synchronization has to run with interrupts disabled the control CPU part can just be done from a SMP function call. The upcoming AP issues that call async only in the case that synchronization is required. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Michael Kelley Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko Tested-by: Helge Deller # parisc Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli # Steam Deck Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512205256.148255496@linutronix.de --- arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 36 +++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c index 9452dc9664b5..bbc440c93e08 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ bool tsc_store_and_check_tsc_adjust(bool bootcpu) */ static atomic_t start_count; static atomic_t stop_count; -static atomic_t skip_test; static atomic_t test_runs; /* @@ -344,20 +343,13 @@ static inline unsigned int loop_timeout(int cpu) } /* - * Source CPU calls into this - it waits for the freshly booted - * target CPU to arrive and then starts the measurement: + * The freshly booted CPU initiates this via an async SMP function call. */ -void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu) +static void check_tsc_sync_source(void *__cpu) { + unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)__cpu; int cpus = 2; - /* - * No need to check if we already know that the TSC is not - * synchronized or if we have no TSC. - */ - if (unsynchronized_tsc()) - return; - /* * Set the maximum number of test runs to * 1 if the CPU does not provide the TSC_ADJUST MSR @@ -368,16 +360,9 @@ void check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu) else atomic_set(&test_runs, 3); retry: - /* - * Wait for the target to start or to skip the test: - */ - while (atomic_read(&start_count) != cpus - 1) { - if (atomic_read(&skip_test) > 0) { - atomic_set(&skip_test, 0); - return; - } + /* Wait for the target to start. */ + while (atomic_read(&start_count) != cpus - 1) cpu_relax(); - } /* * Trigger the target to continue into the measurement too: @@ -397,14 +382,14 @@ retry: if (!nr_warps) { atomic_set(&test_runs, 0); - pr_debug("TSC synchronization [CPU#%d -> CPU#%d]: passed\n", + pr_debug("TSC synchronization [CPU#%d -> CPU#%u]: passed\n", smp_processor_id(), cpu); } else if (atomic_dec_and_test(&test_runs) || random_warps) { /* Force it to 0 if random warps brought us here */ atomic_set(&test_runs, 0); - pr_warn("TSC synchronization [CPU#%d -> CPU#%d]:\n", + pr_warn("TSC synchronization [CPU#%d -> CPU#%u]:\n", smp_processor_id(), cpu); pr_warn("Measured %Ld cycles TSC warp between CPUs, " "turning off TSC clock.\n", max_warp); @@ -457,11 +442,12 @@ void check_tsc_sync_target(void) * SoCs the TSC is frequency synchronized, but still the TSC ADJUST * register might have been wreckaged by the BIOS.. */ - if (tsc_store_and_check_tsc_adjust(false) || tsc_clocksource_reliable) { - atomic_inc(&skip_test); + if (tsc_store_and_check_tsc_adjust(false) || tsc_clocksource_reliable) return; - } + /* Kick the control CPU into the TSC synchronization function */ + smp_call_function_single(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask), check_tsc_sync_source, + (unsigned long *)(unsigned long)cpu, 0); retry: /* * Register this CPU's participation and wait for the -- cgit v1.2.3