From 4e94ddfe2aab72139acb8d5372fac9e6c3f3e383 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Brauner Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:49:11 +0100 Subject: file: remove __receive_fd() Honestly, there's little value in having a helper with and without that int __user *ufd argument. It's just messy and doesn't really give us anything. Just expose receive_fd() with that argument and get rid of that helper. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130-vfs-files-fixes-v1-5-e73ca6f4ea83@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner --- fs/file.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/file.c') diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c index c8eaa0b29a08..3b683b9101d8 100644 --- a/fs/file.c +++ b/fs/file.c @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ out_unlock: } /** - * __receive_fd() - Install received file into file descriptor table + * receive_fd() - Install received file into file descriptor table * @file: struct file that was received from another process * @ufd: __user pointer to write new fd number to * @o_flags: the O_* flags to apply to the new fd entry @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ out_unlock: * * Returns newly install fd or -ve on error. */ -int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags) +int receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags) { int new_fd; int error; @@ -1335,6 +1335,7 @@ int __receive_fd(struct file *file, int __user *ufd, unsigned int o_flags) __receive_sock(file); return new_fd; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(receive_fd); int receive_fd_replace(int new_fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags) { @@ -1350,12 +1351,6 @@ int receive_fd_replace(int new_fd, struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags) return new_fd; } -int receive_fd(struct file *file, unsigned int o_flags) -{ - return __receive_fd(file, NULL, o_flags); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(receive_fd); - static int ksys_dup3(unsigned int oldfd, unsigned int newfd, int flags) { int err = -EBADF; -- cgit v1.2.3