From 4c77b18cf8b7ab37c7d5737b4609010d2ceec5f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:24:35 +0100 Subject: sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() more aggressive Kitsunyan reported desktop latency issues on his Celeron 887 because of commit: 1b568f0aabf2 ("sched/core: Optimize SCHED_SMT") ... even though his CPU doesn't do SMT. The effect of running the SMT code on a !SMT part is basically a more aggressive select_idle_cpu(). Removing the avg condition fixed things for him. I also know FB likes this test gone, even though other workloads like having it. For now, take it out by default, until we get a better idea. Reported-by: kitsunyan Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- kernel/sched/features.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched') diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 274c747a01ce..b3ee10dd3e85 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5797,7 +5797,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor; hackbench in * particularly is sensitive here. */ - if ((avg_idle / 512) < avg_cost) + if (sched_feat(SIS_AVG_CPU) && (avg_idle / 512) < avg_cost) return -1; time = local_clock(); diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h index 69631fa46c2f..1b3c8189b286 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/features.h +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ SCHED_FEAT(NONTASK_CAPACITY, true) */ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true) +/* + * When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain. + */ +SCHED_FEAT(SIS_AVG_CPU, false) + #ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI /* * In order to avoid a thundering herd attack of CPUs that are -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0ba87bb27d66b78e278167ac7e20c66520b8a612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:51:47 +0100 Subject: sched/core: Fix pick_next_task() for RT,DL Pavan noticed that the following commit: 49ee576809d8 ("sched/core: Optimize pick_next_task() for idle_sched_class") ... broke RT,DL balancing by robbing them of the opportinty to do new-'idle' balancing when their last runnable task (on that runqueue) goes away. Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 49ee576809d8 ("sched/core: Optimize pick_next_task() for idle_sched_class") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched') diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index bbfb917a9b49..6699d43a8843 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -3273,10 +3273,15 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) struct task_struct *p; /* - * Optimization: we know that if all tasks are in - * the fair class we can call that function directly: + * Optimization: we know that if all tasks are in the fair class we can + * call that function directly, but only if the @prev task wasn't of a + * higher scheduling class, because otherwise those loose the + * opportunity to pull in more work from other CPUs. */ - if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) { + if (likely((prev->sched_class == &idle_sched_class || + prev->sched_class == &fair_sched_class) && + rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) { + p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf); if (unlikely(p == RETRY_TASK)) goto again; -- cgit v1.2.3