From e3ba8e4e8c19a9b4d1866bc72d81afb10c043560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kang Minchul Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 04:06:47 +0900 Subject: libbpf: Fixed various checkpatch issues in libbpf.c Fixed following checkpatch issues: WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line + * other BPF program's BTF object */ WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'be' + * name. This is important to be be able to find corresponding BTF ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent + switch (ext->kcfg.sz) { + case 1: *(__u8 *)ext_val = value; break; + case 2: *(__u16 *)ext_val = value; break; + case 4: *(__u32 *)ext_val = value; break; + case 8: *(__u64 *)ext_val = value; break; + default: ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line + case 1: *(__u8 *)ext_val = value; break; ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line + case 2: *(__u16 *)ext_val = value; break; ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line + case 4: *(__u32 *)ext_val = value; break; ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line + case 8: *(__u64 *)ext_val = value; break; ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible + }$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line + }$ WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line + * for faster search */ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible +^I^I^I^I^I^I &ext->kcfg.is_signed);$ WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks + if (err) { + return err; + } ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible +^I^I^I^I sizeof(*obj->btf_modules), obj->btf_module_cnt + 1);$ Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221113190648.38556-3-tegongkang@gmail.com --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c') diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 1d263885d635..b5df6aca06ea 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -347,7 +347,8 @@ enum sec_def_flags { SEC_ATTACHABLE = 2, SEC_ATTACHABLE_OPT = SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_EXP_ATTACH_OPT, /* attachment target is specified through BTF ID in either kernel or - * other BPF program's BTF object */ + * other BPF program's BTF object + */ SEC_ATTACH_BTF = 4, /* BPF program type allows sleeping/blocking in kernel */ SEC_SLEEPABLE = 8, @@ -488,7 +489,7 @@ struct bpf_map { char *name; /* real_name is defined for special internal maps (.rodata*, * .data*, .bss, .kconfig) and preserves their original ELF section - * name. This is important to be be able to find corresponding BTF + * name. This is important to be able to find corresponding BTF * DATASEC information. */ char *real_name; @@ -1863,12 +1864,20 @@ static int set_kcfg_value_num(struct extern_desc *ext, void *ext_val, return -ERANGE; } switch (ext->kcfg.sz) { - case 1: *(__u8 *)ext_val = value; break; - case 2: *(__u16 *)ext_val = value; break; - case 4: *(__u32 *)ext_val = value; break; - case 8: *(__u64 *)ext_val = value; break; - default: - return -EINVAL; + case 1: + *(__u8 *)ext_val = value; + break; + case 2: + *(__u16 *)ext_val = value; + break; + case 4: + *(__u32 *)ext_val = value; + break; + case 8: + *(__u64 *)ext_val = value; + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; } ext->is_set = true; return 0; @@ -2770,7 +2779,7 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf) m->type = enum64_placeholder_id; m->offset = 0; } - } + } } return 0; @@ -3518,7 +3527,8 @@ static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj) } /* sort BPF programs by section name and in-section instruction offset - * for faster search */ + * for faster search + */ if (obj->nr_programs) qsort(obj->programs, obj->nr_programs, sizeof(*obj->programs), cmp_progs); @@ -3817,7 +3827,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_externs(struct bpf_object *obj) return -EINVAL; } ext->kcfg.type = find_kcfg_type(obj->btf, t->type, - &ext->kcfg.is_signed); + &ext->kcfg.is_signed); if (ext->kcfg.type == KCFG_UNKNOWN) { pr_warn("extern (kcfg) '%s': type is unsupported\n", ext_name); return -ENOTSUP; @@ -4965,9 +4975,9 @@ bpf_object__reuse_map(struct bpf_map *map) err = bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, pin_fd); close(pin_fd); - if (err) { + if (err) return err; - } + map->pinned = true; pr_debug("reused pinned map at '%s'\n", map->pin_path); @@ -5485,7 +5495,7 @@ static int load_module_btfs(struct bpf_object *obj) } err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **)&obj->btf_modules, &obj->btf_module_cap, - sizeof(*obj->btf_modules), obj->btf_module_cnt + 1); + sizeof(*obj->btf_modules), obj->btf_module_cnt + 1); if (err) goto err_out; @@ -6237,7 +6247,8 @@ bpf_object__reloc_code(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *main_prog, * prog; each main prog can have a different set of * subprograms appended (potentially in different order as * well), so position of any subprog can be different for - * different main programs */ + * different main programs + */ insn->imm = subprog->sub_insn_off - (prog->sub_insn_off + insn_idx) - 1; pr_debug("prog '%s': insn #%zu relocated, imm %d points to subprog '%s' (now at %zu offset)\n", @@ -10995,7 +11006,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_usdt(const struct bpf_program *prog, usdt_cookie = OPTS_GET(opts, usdt_cookie, 0); link = usdt_manager_attach_usdt(obj->usdt_man, prog, pid, binary_path, - usdt_provider, usdt_name, usdt_cookie); + usdt_provider, usdt_name, usdt_cookie); err = libbpf_get_error(link); if (err) return libbpf_err_ptr(err); @@ -12304,7 +12315,7 @@ int bpf_object__open_subskeleton(struct bpf_object_subskeleton *s) btf = bpf_object__btf(s->obj); if (!btf) { pr_warn("subskeletons require BTF at runtime (object %s)\n", - bpf_object__name(s->obj)); + bpf_object__name(s->obj)); return libbpf_err(-errno); } -- cgit v1.2.3 From dc79f035b2062e4ff4f6432eda18f461f82b1333 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:15:29 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Workaround for llvm nop-4 bug Currently LLVM fails to recognize .data.* as data section and defaults to .text section. Later BPF backend tries to emit 4-byte NOP instruction which doesn't exist in BPF ISA and aborts. The fix for LLVM is pending: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138477 While waiting for the fix lets workaround the linked_list test case by using .bss.* prefix which is properly recognized by LLVM as BSS section. Fix libbpf to support .bss. prefix and adjust tests. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c') diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index b5df6aca06ea..93ccea238391 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -3511,7 +3511,8 @@ static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj) sec_desc->sec_type = SEC_RELO; sec_desc->shdr = sh; sec_desc->data = data; - } else if (sh->sh_type == SHT_NOBITS && strcmp(name, BSS_SEC) == 0) { + } else if (sh->sh_type == SHT_NOBITS && (strcmp(name, BSS_SEC) == 0 || + str_has_pfx(name, BSS_SEC "."))) { sec_desc->sec_type = SEC_BSS; sec_desc->shdr = sh; sec_desc->data = data; -- cgit v1.2.3