diff options
| author |  Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
| 2023-02-14 15:26:33 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |  Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
| 2023-02-17 17:43:07 +0100 |
| commit | 64f50f6575721ef03d001e907455cbe3baa2a5b1 (patch) | |
| tree | 7c487fd3cc1be21498883f3e7c2290da88c13dcd /arch/loongarch | |
| parent | bpf: bpf_fib_lookup should not return neigh in NUD_FAILED state (diff) | |
| download | linux-64f50f6575721ef03d001e907455cbe3baa2a5b1.tar.gz linux-64f50f6575721ef03d001e907455cbe3baa2a5b1.tar.bz2 linux-64f50f6575721ef03d001e907455cbe3baa2a5b1.zip | |
LoongArch, bpf: Use 4 instructions for function address in JIT
This patch fixes the following issue of function calls in JIT, like:
[ 29.346981] multi-func JIT bug 105 != 103
The issus can be reproduced by running the "inline simple bpf_loop call"
verifier test.
This is because we are emiting 2-4 instructions for 64-bit immediate moves.
During the first pass of JIT, the placeholder address is zero, emiting two
instructions for it. In the extra pass, the function address is in XKVRANGE,
emiting four instructions for it. This change the instruction index in
JIT context. Let's always use 4 instructions for function address in JIT.
So that the instruction sequences don't change between the first pass and
the extra pass for function calls.
Fixes: 5dc615520c4d ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support")
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230214152633.2265699-1-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/loongarch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h | 21 |
2 files changed, 22 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c index c4b1947ebf76..288003a9f0ca 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext if (ret < 0) return ret; - move_imm(ctx, t1, func_addr, is32); + move_addr(ctx, t1, func_addr); emit_insn(ctx, jirl, t1, LOONGARCH_GPR_RA, 0); move_reg(ctx, regmap[BPF_REG_0], LOONGARCH_GPR_A0); break; diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h index ca708024fdd3..c335dc4eed37 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -82,6 +82,27 @@ static inline void emit_sext_32(struct jit_ctx *ctx, enum loongarch_gpr reg, boo emit_insn(ctx, addiw, reg, reg, 0); } +static inline void move_addr(struct jit_ctx *ctx, enum loongarch_gpr rd, u64 addr) +{ + u64 imm_11_0, imm_31_12, imm_51_32, imm_63_52; + + /* lu12iw rd, imm_31_12 */ + imm_31_12 = (addr >> 12) & 0xfffff; + emit_insn(ctx, lu12iw, rd, imm_31_12); + + /* ori rd, rd, imm_11_0 */ + imm_11_0 = addr & 0xfff; + emit_insn(ctx, ori, rd, rd, imm_11_0); + + /* lu32id rd, imm_51_32 */ + imm_51_32 = (addr >> 32) & 0xfffff; + emit_insn(ctx, lu32id, rd, imm_51_32); + + /* lu52id rd, rd, imm_63_52 */ + imm_63_52 = (addr >> 52) & 0xfff; + emit_insn(ctx, lu52id, rd, rd, imm_63_52); +} + static inline void move_imm(struct jit_ctx *ctx, enum loongarch_gpr rd, long imm, bool is32) { long imm_11_0, imm_31_12, imm_51_32, imm_63_52, imm_51_0, imm_51_31; |