diff options
| author |  Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
| 2020-06-29 14:49:16 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |  Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
| 2020-07-07 07:15:07 -0700 |
| commit | 0e8e2c6343dd74a4f55f8507a9fae9064d456436 (patch) | |
| tree | 6138be26e98203a85d69b3ca018ed12cc02c30c5 /fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | |
| parent | xfs: remove IO submission from xfs_reclaim_inode() (diff) | |
| download | linux-0e8e2c6343dd74a4f55f8507a9fae9064d456436.tar.gz linux-0e8e2c6343dd74a4f55f8507a9fae9064d456436.tar.bz2 linux-0e8e2c6343dd74a4f55f8507a9fae9064d456436.zip | |
xfs: allow multiple reclaimers per AG
Inode reclaim will still throttle direct reclaim on the per-ag
reclaim locks. This is no longer necessary as reclaim can run
non-blocking now. Hence we can remove these locks so that we don't
arbitrarily block reclaimers just because there are more direct
reclaimers than there are AGs.
This can result in multiple reclaimers working on the same range of
an AG, but this doesn't cause any apparent issues. Optimising the
spread of concurrent reclaimers for best efficiency can be done in a
future patchset.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c index fa4df9b4edb5..592eab23c6e7 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c @@ -1211,12 +1211,9 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag( int *nr_to_scan) { struct xfs_perag *pag; - xfs_agnumber_t ag; - int trylock = flags & SYNC_TRYLOCK; - int skipped; + xfs_agnumber_t ag = 0; + int skipped = 0; - ag = 0; - skipped = 0; while ((pag = xfs_perag_get_tag(mp, ag, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG))) { unsigned long first_index = 0; int done = 0; @@ -1224,15 +1221,13 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag( ag = pag->pag_agno + 1; - if (trylock) { - if (!mutex_trylock(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock)) { - skipped++; - xfs_perag_put(pag); - continue; - } - first_index = pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor; - } else - mutex_lock(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock); + /* + * If the cursor is not zero, we haven't scanned the whole AG + * so we might have skipped inodes here. + */ + first_index = READ_ONCE(pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor); + if (first_index) + skipped++; do { struct xfs_inode *batch[XFS_LOOKUP_BATCH]; @@ -1298,11 +1293,9 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag( } while (nr_found && !done && *nr_to_scan > 0); - if (trylock && !done) - pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor = first_index; - else - pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor = 0; - mutex_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock); + if (done) + first_index = 0; + WRITE_ONCE(pag->pag_ici_reclaim_cursor, first_index); xfs_perag_put(pag); } return skipped; |